Services
QA & Test Automation
Finding the breakage before your users do, on the devices and connections your users actually have.
Short answer
QA and test automation verify that software works before it reaches users and keeps working as it changes. BetterSoftZ provides test strategy, manual exploratory testing, automated regression suites, real-device Android testing and performance and payment-flow testing, either alongside our own builds or for software another team has written.
What this gets you
- Regressions caught by the pipeline, not by a customer
- Releases that stop being an all-night event
- Payment and reconciliation paths verified, including failures
- Evidence for buyers or auditors who ask how you test
- Clear severity triage instead of a bug list nobody ranks
What we test first
Testing effort follows business risk, not feature count. On a first engagement we usually start with: anything that moves money, anything that changes permissions, anything that produces a number someone signs, and anything that writes to an external system. Those four areas produce most of the incidents that actually hurt.
The mix that works
- Exploratory testing by a person for new features, where the goal is to find the unexpected rather than confirm the expected.
- Automated regression for the paths that must never break, run on every merge so breakage is attributed to a specific change.
- Real-device testing on the Android models your users actually own.
- Performance testing against a stated target — “handles the Eid sale weekend” is only useful once it is expressed as concurrent users and response times.
Defects need severity, not just a list
A backlog of four hundred unranked bugs tells nobody what to do. We triage by business impact: what blocks money or compliance, what degrades the experience, and what is cosmetic. That ordering is agreed with you once, then applied consistently, so release decisions stop being arguments.
Leaving your team able to continue
The suite belongs to you and is written to be maintained by your engineers: no proprietary recording tool, no dependence on one person’s laptop, and documentation on how to add a case. If we leave, the tests keep running.
In every engagement
- Test strategy and prioritised risk areas
- Automated regression suite in your pipeline
- Real-device coverage across common Bangladeshi Android models
- Performance testing against agreed load targets
- Defect triage process with severity definitions
- Handover so your team can maintain the suite
What we build it with
- Playwright
- Cypress
- Jest
- Pest
- k6
- GitHub Actions
This service, by sector
Frequently asked questions
Can you test software your team did not build?
Yes, and it is a common starting point — often as part of assessing a build inherited from another vendor. We begin with an exploratory pass against the critical business flows, which usually tells you more in a week than a month of bug reports from users.
Should everything be automated?
No. Automate what is repetitive, stable and high risk: login, checkout, payment, permissions, reporting totals. Leave genuinely exploratory testing to people, who are far better at noticing that something is merely odd.
Which devices do you test on?
Real phones in the range your users carry, not only emulators — the mid-range Android models common in Bangladesh, on throttled connections. Emulators miss exactly the problems those devices produce.
How do you test payment flows safely?
In provider sandboxes with scripted failure cases: timeouts, duplicate callbacks, partial refunds and reconciliation mismatches. The happy path is the easy part; almost every serious payment defect lives in the failure paths.
Tell us what you need built.
Describe the problem in plain words. We will tell you what it takes to build and roughly what it costs.