Integration with Microsoft infrastructure
Services that sit alongside SQL Server, Windows-hosted systems and existing internal tools, where the new code has to fit what the organisation already runs.
Hire developers
Enterprise back ends and integrations on .NET.
Hiring .net developers through BetterSoftZ means engaging engineers employed in Dhaka who work exclusively on your product on a monthly agreement. They work in your repository and sprint process, you meet them before the engagement starts, and all code and infrastructure remain yours.
Services that sit alongside SQL Server, Windows-hosted systems and existing internal tools, where the new code has to fit what the organisation already runs.
Strongly typed ASP.NET Core APIs for systems that must be supported for many years, with versioning, logging and clear contracts for the teams that call them.
Moving a desktop or older web application forward in stages, wrapping what works, replacing what does not, and keeping the business running throughout.
Reporting services and scheduled exports built on data that already lives in SQL Server, with queries written to be read and maintained by someone else later.
A .NET engagement is usually one or two .NET engineers working with whoever owns the existing systems on your side. Because the local pool is smaller, we recommend naming the engineers before you commit and keeping a second person familiar with the codebase, so the work does not depend on one individual.
The .NET talent pool in Dhaka is smaller than PHP or JavaScript, so team ramp-up can take longer. That is worth knowing before you commit.
Hiring developers here normally means the dedicated team model: a named squad works only on your product for a monthly fee, and you decide scope sprint by sprint. There is a three-month minimum, then it runs month to month. Two other models exist, and the right one depends on how settled the work is.
Best when the roadmap runs past one release and priorities shift. This is what hiring developers usually means.
Better when you can specify the whole project up front and want one figure with milestone payments, rather than engineers by the month.
Suits discovery, audits and support, billed against time worked with a cap agreed in advance.
Under every model, source code and infrastructure accounts are yours, you get working software on a staging link every two weeks, and you get written progress notes each week.
You describe the work, the roadmap and how your sprints run. We propose a squad shape that fits, not a standard package.
You see CVs, then speak to the people proposed. If someone is not right, we propose another rather than defend the first choice.
Each engineer gets a named account in your repository, tracker and chat, in accounts you own. We suggest giving only the access the work needs.
We suggest the first task is small but real: a change that goes through your whole pipeline to staging, so any friction in the process shows up before large work begins.
Regular sprints, written weekly notes, and a notice period and handover plan that were agreed in the contract before anyone started.
Dhaka is GMT+6 and Bangladesh does not currently use daylight saving, so the offset only moves when your clocks do. That makes the overlap simple arithmetic. Dhaka is 6 hours ahead of the UK in winter and 5 in summer, so a morning in the UK is already afternoon in Dhaka. It is 10 to 11 hours ahead of US Eastern time, so overlap with the US is the end of the Dhaka day. Australia is 4 to 5 hours ahead of Dhaka, which leaves a large shared window.
We recommend agreeing a core overlap window in writing at the start, for stand-ups and reviews, and letting everything else run asynchronously through the tracker and written notes. Tell us your hours in the brief and we will say plainly how much overlap that gives you.
Engagement
Yes, many inherited systems run on .NET Framework. We read the code first, then say whether to upgrade in place, in stages or leave it alone. Moving to current .NET is a choice with costs, not a default.
The pool is smaller than for PHP or JavaScript, so assembling a team can take longer. We would rather tell you that up front and name candidates before you sign than promise a date we cannot hold.
Azure is among the technologies they work with, but hosting is your decision. Whatever you choose, it runs in accounts you own, so you are never dependent on us to access your own infrastructure.
Typically two to three weeks from agreement, depending on the seniority mix. We would rather propose a start date we can hold than promise next Monday and put whoever happens to be free on your product.
Yes, and we recommend it. You see CVs, then speak to the people proposed. If someone is not right for your team, we propose someone else rather than pushing the original choice.
Scaling up takes a few weeks for the right person. Scaling down follows the notice period in the agreement. Neither requires renegotiating the whole contract.
A monthly rate per engineer, set by seniority and agreed before start, with no separate recruitment or onboarding fee. We quote after understanding the work, because a team shape proposed without that is guesswork.
You do. You set priorities, review the work and run the sprint. The engineers are employed by BetterSoftZ in Dhaka, and the agreement sets out how a handover works if someone leaves or must be replaced.
You do. Source code and work product belong to you on payment, and repositories, hosting and third-party services run in accounts you own, so you never depend on us to reach your own system.
We will propose a squad shape, name the engineers, and set a start date we can actually hold.